The Law Offices of Angela L. Williams, LLC

  • Welcome
  • Practice Areas
  • Professional Associations, Community Involvement and Education
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Published Work
  • Radio
  • Legislative Testimony
  • Contact Me

Tag Archives: Prosecutorial Discretion

A Breakdown of DHS’s Deferred Action for DREAMers » Immigration Impact

Posted on June 18, 2012 by Angie Williams Posted in Deportation, DREAM Act, Immigration, Practice Pointers, Procedure, Prosecutorial Discretion .

A Breakdown of DHS’s Deferred Action for DREAMers » Immigration Impact.

 

DO NOT TURN YOUR SELF INTO IMMIGRATION, ICE OR CBP.  Please contact my office or another qualified IMMIGRATION LAWYER to discuss potential eligibility.  Not everyone is going to qualify and not everyone maybe should apply.  A decision to apply needs to be made after the program is clearly proposed and in place and after the potential benefits and risks are explained.

 

There is not anything to apply for yet if you are not already in removal proceedings.  If you are in removal, please contact your lawyer or an immigration lawyer regarding the options for applying.  If you already have a final order please contact your attorney or the hotlines listed at the bottom of the memo in the link to discuss your options.

This is not amnesty nor is is a permanent status. As of now it will not lead to any permanent benefits like residency or citizenship.  Please be wary of people who are not immigration lawyers giving advice on this or advertising that you can apply affirmatively now.  Notarios are not attorneys and should not be relied upon to make important decisions related to whether you or your family qualifies for any immigration benefit.

0 Like
Tags: deferred action, DREAM Act, Obama, Prosecutorial Discretion .

What Prosecutorial Discretion is and is not by AILA

Posted on January 3, 2012 by Angie Williams Posted in Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Immigration, Notario Fraud, Politicians making things worse, Prosecutorial Discretion .

 

From AILA (American Immigration Lawyers Association).  This is an excellent public service announcement regarding the August announcement on prosecutorial discretion, what it is and what it isn’t.  There is a HUGE problem with Notarios and them scamming people out of thousands of dollars and often out of immigration benefits.  So please read and pass it on. It is in Spanish below the English in the Same Post.  La Version Espanol sigue.

DON’T GET SCAMMED!

What You Need to Know About Recent DHS Announcements

In August, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that it would be reviewing all cases pending in immigration court and temporarily closing low priority cases. In November, it announced that it had begun the case review process and issued three documents explaining the review: Memo on Case Review Process; Guidance to ICE Attorneys; and ICE Next Steps. For more information, visit www.aila.org/pd.

This case review is NOT an amnesty and it is NOT about giving people work permits or legal status. You should NOT turn yourself into the immigration authorities because of these announcements.

  •  Do NOT believe anyone who tells you they can get you a work permit (Employment Authorization Document or “EAD”) or legal status based on this case review process! Anyone who says this or makes other guarantees is not to be trusted!
  •  There is NO “safe” way to turn yourself in to immigration and there is NO guarantee that your case will be considered “low priority.” ANY person who comes into contact with immigration authorities may be arrested, detained or even removed.
  •  Only a QUALIFIED IMMIGRATION LAWYER can evaluate your case and tell you about your rights.
  •  Do NOT seek legal advice from a notario or immigration consultant.
  •  For more information about avoiding immigration scams, visit www.StopNotarioFraud.org.

    Why Is the Government Conducting This Review?

    Law enforcement agencies, including immigration, have the authority to decide which cases to prosecute and which cases to put on hold or dismiss. This authority is called “prosecutorial discretion.” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)—the agency that prosecutes immigration cases—has decided to use its prosecutorial discretion authority to put some low priority cases temporarily on hold so that it can speed up higher priority cases.

    Which Cases Are Being Reviewed?

    Right now, two reviews are taking place. The first review is occurring nationwide and includes: (1) new cases; (2) all cases with hearings on or before January 13, 2012; and (3) some cases with hearings on or before June 15, 2012. For individuals in detention, it is unclear whether or not your case will be part of this review.

    The second review is taking place in only Baltimore and Denver. ALL cases currently pending before the immigration court are being reviewed. For individuals in detention, your case is NOT part of this review.

    If you have never come to the attention of immigration authorities, do NOT turn yourself in. Your case is NOT part of either of these reviews.

AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 11123061. (Posted 12/30/11) 

What Will Happen if My Case Is Chosen for Prosecutorial Discretion?

The government has said that it will be offering administrative closure to individuals with low priority cases. Administrative closure means that your immigration court case will be halted temporarily. You will not be given a new court date, but your case has not ended and can be restarted at any time.

For some people, administrative closure is helpful because it means that no decision about whether or not they should be deported from the U.S. will be made while the case is closed. However, for others, administrative closure may NOT be helpful. For example, if you have applied for legal status, the immigration judge cannot make a decision on your application if your case is closed.

If your case is chosen for administrative closure, someone from the government will contact you. You will need to choose whether or not you want your case to be closed. If you have questions about what is best in your situation, you should consult a reputable immigration attorney.

Will I Get a Work Permit if My Case Is Chosen for Prosecutorial Discretion?

The government has said that you will not be able to apply for a work permit just because your case has been administratively closed. If you do not have a work permit now, you will probably NOT be able to get a work permit once your case is closed.

What Will Happen if My Case Is NOT Chosen for Prosecutorial Discretion?

If your case is not chosen for prosecutorial discretion, nothing will change for you.

What Is a “Low Priority” Case?

Only the government can decide whether or not your case is a low priority case. The cases that ICE considers low priority are listed in the Guidance to ICE Attorneys. These include cases involving members of the Armed Forces or their family members, people who came to the U.S. when they were very young, victims of serious crimes, those with serious medical conditions, and people who have been in the U.S. for a very long time and have many ties to this country, among others. However, just because a case seems to fall into one or more of those categories does NOT automatically mean that it will be considered “low priority.”

What Is a “High Priority” Case?

The cases that ICE considers high priority are listed in the Guidance to ICE Attorneys. They include cases of individuals with criminal convictions, gang members, those who entered the U.S. within the last three years, suspected terrorists, and those who have previously been removed from the U.S.

Do I Need a Lawyer?

Immigration law is complex and if you have questions about your immigration case, you may want to speak with a qualified immigration attorney about your situation. REMEMBER, it is important that you speak with an attorney you can trust and who will give you accurate advice. It is unlawful for an immigration consultant, notary public or “notario publico” to provide legal advice. For more information on protecting yourself from immigration scams, visitwww.stopnotariofraud.org.

What Do I Need to Do Now?

You do not need to do anything to have your case reviewed. This will happen automatically if your case is part of the review process. However, if you would like your case to be administratively closed, you may want to give the government more information about your case to show why you should get prosecutorial discretion. Remember that any information you provide will become part of your immigration file and can be used against you. If you would like to give the government additional information, we strongly encourage you to contact a qualified immigration attorney for assistance.

AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 11123061. (Posted 12/30/11) 

¡QUE NO LE ESTAFEN!
LO QUE USTED DEBE SABER SOBRE LOS COMUNICADOS MAS RECIENTES

DEL DEPARTAMENTO DE LA SEGURIDAD DE LA PATRIA

En agosto, el Departamento de Seguridad de la Patria (DHS por sus siglas en ingles), informo que estaría revisando todos los casos pendientes ante un juzgado de inmigración y cerrando temporalmente aquellos casos de baja prioridad. En noviembre, anunció que había comenzado el proceso de revisión de casos y había emitido tres documentos explicando la revisión: Memorándum sobre el proceso de revisión de casos; guía para los abogados de la agencia de imposición de inmigración y aduanas (ICE por sus siglas en ingles); y los siguientes pasos para la agencia de imposición de inmigración y aduanas. Para más información, visite la página de Internet www.aila.org/pd.

Esta revisión de casos NO es una amnistía y NO se trata de darles a personas permisos de trabajo ni estatus legal. Usted NO deber entregarse a las autoridades de inmigración debido a estos comunicados.

  • ¡NO crea a nadie quien le diga que le pueda conseguir un permiso de trabajo (el documento de autorización laboral o EAD por sus siglas en ingles) o estatus legal basándose en este proceso de revisión de casos! ¡Cualquier persona que diga esto u ofrezca otras garantías no es de fiar!
  • NO existe ninguna manera “segura” de entregarse a inmigración y NO existe garantía de que su caso será considerado como de “baja prioridad”. CUALQUIER persona que entre en contacto con las autoridades de inmigración puede ser arrestada, detenida o incluso removida.
  • Solamente un ABOGADO TITULADO DE INMIGRACIÓN puede evaluar su caso e informarle sobre sus derechos.
  • NO pida consejo legal a un notario ni de un asesor de inmigración.
  • Para mas información de como evitar estas estafas de inmigración, visite la página de internet www.StopNotarioFraud.org.

    ¿Por qué el gobierno está realizando esta revisión?

    Las agencias del orden público, incluyendo inmigración, tienen la autoridad para decidir cuales casos van a procesar y cuales casos van a poner en espera o desestimar. Esta autoridad se denomina “facultad discrecional”. La agencia de imposición de inmigración y aduanas (ICE por sus siglas en ingles) ‐–la agencia que procesa los casos de inmigración— ha decidido utilizar la autoridad concedida de facultad discrecional para poner algunos casos, de manera temporal, en estatus de espera, para así poder acelerar los casos de alta prioridad.

    ¿Cuales casos están siendo revisados?

    Actualmente se están llevando a cabo dos revisiones. La primera revisión está tomando lugar a nivel nacional e incluye: (1) casos nuevos; (2) todos aquellos casos que tengan una audiencia en o antes del 13 de enero de 2012; y (3) algunos casos con audiencias en o antes del 15 de junio de 2012. Para aquellos individuos que estén detenidos, no esta claro si su caso va a formar parte de esta revisión.

page3image24688
page3image24960
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 11123061. (Posted 12/30/11) 

La segunda revisión se está llevando a cabo solamente en Baltimore y Denver. TODO caso actualmente pendiente ante un juzgado de inmigración será revisado. Para aquellos individuos que estén detenidos, su caso NO formará parte de esta revisión.

Si usted nunca ha sido considerado por las autoridades de inmigración, NO se entregue. Su caso NO forma parte de ninguna de estas dos revisiones.

¿Que sucederá si mi caso es elegido por la facultad discrecional?

El gobierno ha indicado que estará ofreciendo una clausura administrativa a individuos con casos de baja prioridad. Un cierre administrativo significa que su caso ante un juzgado de inmigración será interrumpido temporalmente. No le darán una nueva fecha para una audiencia, pero su caso no se ha terminado y puede volverse a iniciar en cualquier momento.

Para algunas personas, la clausura administrativa puede ser beneficioso porque significa que ninguna decisión sobre si usted debe de ser deportado de EE.UU. será decidido mientras el caso esté cerrado. No obstante, para otros, la clausura administrativa puede NO ser beneficiosa. Por ejemplo, si usted ha solicitado estatus legal, el juez de inmigración no puede tomar una decisión sobre su solicitud si su caso está cerrado.

Si su caso es seleccionado para la clausura administrativa, alguien del gobierno se pondrá en contacto con usted. Usted deberá decidir si quiere o no que su caso sea cerrado. Si usted tiene alguna pregunta sobre que es lo mejor para su situación, deberá consultar con un abogado de inmigración acreditado.

¿Obtendré un permiso de trabajo si mi caso es seleccionado para la facultad discrecional?

El gobierno ha indicado que usted no podrá solicitar un permiso de trabajo solamente porque su caso ha sido cerrado administrativamente. Si usted no tiene un permiso de trabajo ahora, lo más probable es que NO podrá obtener un permiso de trabajo una vez que se cierre su caso.

¿Que sucederá si mi caso NO es seleccionado para la facultad discrecional?
Si su caso no es elegido para la facultad discrecional, no habrá cambios para usted. ¿Que es un caso de “baja prioridad”?

Solamente el gobierno puede decidir si su caso puede ser considerado de baja prioridad. Los casos que la agencia de imposición de inmigración y aduanas (ICE por sus siglas en ingles) considera de baja prioridad están anotados en la guía para abogados de ICE. Estos incluyen casos afectando a miembros de las fuerzas armadas o sus familiares, personas que vinieron a los EE.UU. cuando eran aun muy jóvenes, victimas de un crimen agravado, aquellos que tengan una condición medica grave, y personas que hayan permanecido en los EE.UU. por mucho tiempo y tienen muchas conexiones con este país, entre otros. No obstante, solo porque un caso parezca que posea una o más de estas categorías NO significa que automáticamente serán considerados de “baja prioridad.”

¿Que es un caso de “alta prioridad?

Los casos que la agencia de imposición de inmigración y aduanas (ICE por sus siglas en ingles) considera de alta prioridad están anotadas en la guía para abogados de ICE. Incluyen casos de individuos con convicciones criminales, miembros de bandas organizadas, aquellos que hayan entrado a los EE.UU. dentro de los últimos tres años, sospechosos de terrorismo, y aquellos que hayan sido removidos de EE.UU. con anterioridad.

¿Necesito un abogado?

Las leyes de inmigración son complejas y si usted tiene preguntas sobre su caso de inmigración, es aconsejable que hable con un abogado de inmigración calificado sobre su situación particular. RECUERDE, es importante que hable con un abogado de confianza y quien le puede ofrecer consejo veraz. Es ilícito que un asesor de inmigración, un notario o un “notario publico” imparta consejo legal. Para más información en cómo protegerse de estafas de inmigración visite la página de internet www.stopnotariofraud.org.

page4image31480
AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 11123061. (Posted 12/30/11) 

¿Que debo de hacer ahora?

Usted no necesita hacer nada para que su caso sea revisado. Esto va a suceder de manera automática si su caso es parte del proceso de revisión. No obstante, si usted desea que su caso sea clausurado administrativamente, es aconsejable que provea al gobierno con más información sobre su caso para demonstrar por qué le deben conceder la facultad discrecional. Recuerde que cualquier información que usted presente formará parte de su expediente de inmigración y puede ser usado contra usted. Si usted desea enviarle al gobierno información adicional, le aconsejamos energéticamente que se comunique con un abogado titulado de inmigración para que le ayude.

AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 11123061. (Posted 12/30/11) 
2 Like
Tags: Amnesty, Attorney, immigration "consultant", misconceptions, Misinformation, Morton Memo, Notario, Notario fraud, Prosecutorial Discretion .

Morton Memo Changed Nothing

Posted on December 25, 2011 by Angie Williams Posted in Deportation, Immigration, Immigration Myths, Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State), Politicians making things worse, Prosecutorial Discretion, State Based Immigration Laws, Yearly Removal Numbers .

Published in Missouri Lawyers Weekly,Vol 25, No 46 on November 11, 2011

By Angela L. Williams

On August 18, 2011 President Obama announced that he wanted DHS and ICE to use discretion in deciding who to put into removal proceedings and to encourage the Trial Attorneys to exercise their prosecutorial discretion to possibly administratively close certain pending cases now before the immigration courts in our country in certain exceptional circumstances.  In the announcement Obama claimed that all of the over 300,000 cases now pending in our immigration court system would be reviewed to determine if resources were best served by continuing with the case or administratively closing some “low enforcement priority” cases.

This announcement, know as the Morton Memo immediately sent Republicans and other immigration restrictions and alarmists into a frenzy of whiny proclamations on all the news networks denouncing the memo as “amnesty,” a word which by the way is as meaningless as it is inflammatory.  While these reactionists have spent the months since the announcements with their collective panties in a twist, riling up populist support with meaningless phrases and false doomsday prophesies about the millions of criminals, drug traffickers and MS 13 Gang members who were going to be granted “amnesty,” those of us working in the trenches of our irrevocably broken system took this announcement as little more than lip service and more empty promises and false hope from an administration that has proven to consistently promise one thing and do another in regards to this issue.  I for one, never expected to see any significant improvement in the way ICE and the DOJ evaluate and handle the cases of people in removal proceedings, the vast majority of whom carry no criminal record or nothing more than misdemeanor convictions, and for once I have not been disappointed.

So what was this big announcement?  Obama urged trial attorneys (prosecutors for removal proceedings) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE, the police branch of immigration) to evaluate cases and potential cases using a set of guidelines set out in several memos over many years and summarized in a memo written by John Morton on June 17, 2011 that builds on prior memos on prosecutorial discretion going all the way back to 1976.  The memo itself purports to address “Exercising Prosecutorial Discretion Consistent with the Civil Immigration Enforcement Priorities of the Agency for the Apprehension, Detention and Removal of Aliens.”  The memo emphasizes that because there is way more undocumented people than resources to remove them, the agency must prioritize enforcement efforts in order to maximize the effect of the removals that do, in fact occur each year.

The memo says the agency priorities are “the promotion of national security, border security, public safety and the integrity of the immigration system.”  It emphasizes that prosecutors have always had this discretion and have always been able to use it to decide when to exercise the full force of the agency against a person charged with removability.  The memo lays out what the agency considers low priorities for removal.  This list includes veterans and members of the armed forces, long time lawful permanent residents, minors and the elderly, individuals present in the US since childhood, pregnant or nursing women, victims of domestic violence, trafficking or other serious crimes, individuals that suffer from mental or physical disabilities and individuals with serious health conditions.  People with these factors presents should be examined carefully to see if they have any negative factors that would tend to discourage the exercise of discretion.  The memo says that this should be done in all cases and can be done at any stage of a case in the interest of preserving resources.  The memo also notes that there is no right to receive prosecutorial discretion nor is there any guarantee that any discretion will be used in any individual case even where the factors in favor of discretion are present.  In other words, the memo restated agency priorities and agency policy that has been around since the mid 70’s and created no new rights, no new law nor any new priorities or changes in policy.

The announcement and the Morton Memo seemed to many to be a positive step in dealing with the realities of our current system with the most sympathetic cases in light of Congress’ epic failure to act.  It also came at the height of last summer’s budget non-crisis at a time when everyone was talking about our tremendous national debt, or inability to balance the budget and generally spending like teenagers with unfettered access to a trust fund for the last 2 decades.  So At first blush it seemed to be both a positive and financially prudent step.  Furthermore, it certainly sent the anti-immigration lobby into a tailspin, so it must have merit…right?  My experience is that nothing has really changed.

Actually, truth be told, I wish Obama had kept his mouth shut and not even made the announcement in the first place, or at least announced in a less public and grand stand-y way.  All he did was throw gas on a fire that is already burning dangerously out of control and increase the rancor and violence that has become the sorry excuse for a national dialogue on this issue.

We have public officials saying things like maybe the solution to our illegal immigration problem is to shoot them out of helicopters like the way western Kansas controls feral hogs (Kansas State Representative Virgil Peck), or that we should electrify the fence on the border and put a sign n the other side saying it will kill you, (Presidential Hopeful Herman Cain) or that a Congressman would do anything short of shooting them to stop illegal immigration (Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks) or claiming that people come here solely to have babies in some insidious program called “drop and leave” (South Carolina  Sen. Lindsey Graham) or even that saying that we are all responsible for the immigration situation by loving the cheap labor and failing to elect officials who will responsibly reform is like saying we are all responsible when a rapist goes off the rails and rapes a bunch of people. (Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach.)(He said this at a conference I attended at the University of Kansas where he and 2 other attorneys had a “debate” about immigration.) or that the reason we should eliminate the 14th amendment and birthright citizenship is because it is a hole in our national defense whereby people come to the US and have babies so they are citizens and then raise them to be homegrown terrorists, i.e. terror babies(BOTH Texas Republican State Rep Debbie Riddle and Federal Rep. Louie Gohmert.)

Somehow this type of violent and shameful rhetoric has become acceptable and actually expected if a candidate expects to win votes. The ever loonier Tea Party and Republicans have taken this instant poll topper to knew heights as they try to out do each other in some sort of macabre contest to see who can heap the most ugliness, hate and rancor on immigrants generally and Latinos specifically.  As the sorry lot of Republican hopefuls flock to the likes of Sheriff Joe Arpio for his blessing to run for office like some sort of racist, public-fund-misappropriating Godfather the Democrats sit spinelessly by watching completely impotent to pass even the least controversial and humanitarian of immigration reform, the DREAM act.

The timing of the announcement as well soured the underlying tone of the announcement as well.   The announcement came at the heals of a widely publicized speech Obama gave in EL Paso, Texas about the national priorities for removal of those unlawfully present in the United States.  In this speech in EL Paso, Texas on May 10, 2011 Obama decried his frustration in the struggle to reform our system.  He laid blame at the Republicans who, for years have been spouting the same nonsense that they will not consider reform until we enforce the laws we have.  He informed the listeners that we have done that.  And indeed that is true.  “Under Secretary Napolitano’s leadership, we have strengthened border security beyond what many believed was possible.  They wanted more agents on the border.  Well, we now have more boots on the ground on the southwest border than at any time in our nation’s history.  The Border Patrol has 20,000 agents, more than twice as many as there were in 2004…(w)e tripled the number of intelligence analysts working the border.  I’ve deployed unmanned aerial vehicles to patrol the skies from Texas to California.  We’ve forged a partnership with Mexico to fight transnational criminal organizations…(a)nd for the first time we are screening 100% of the southbound rail shipments.”  Also the number of removals has drastically increased under Obama.

Later in his speech in El Paso Obama said, “Now I know the increase in deportations has been a source of controversy.  But I want to emphasize: we are not going about this haphazardly; we are focusing our limited resources on violent offenders and people convicted of crimes; not families, not folks who are just looking to scrape together an income…Even as we recognize that enforcing the law is necessary, we don’t relish the pain it causes in the lives of people just trying to get by.  And as long as the current laws are on the books, its not just hardened felons who are subject to removal; but also families just trying to earn a living, bright and eager students; decent people with the best of intentions.”  The point: DHS is targeting criminals and making them a priority, but that doesn’t mean that non-criminals won’t also be removed.

But in June of 2011 Department of Homeland Security released its numbers of removals for fiscal year 2010 and advocates were outraged at what seemed to be a complete contradiction to Obama’s claim that families and non-criminals were not the target, though not guaranteed immunity from removal.  In that year a total of 387,242 people were removed from the United States in one form or another, down slightly from 2009 (395,165) but significantly higher then the highest number under President George W. Bush (2007 319,382).  DHS claims that of the 387,242 people removed in FY2010 168,532 of them were “Convicted Criminals.”

In and of itself it seems like a good thing that this many “Convicted Criminals” were removed from the country; however a closer at the data tells a different story and this is what angered observers.  If only 168,532 of those removed were “convicted criminals” that means that 218,710 (56.47%), not even a majority, had no criminal record at all.  Looking more closely at the breakdown of “convicted criminals” that were removed in FY2010 advocates saw some vague and disturbing categories of “criminal offenses.”  The most disturbing in this list are “Criminal Traffic Offenses” (30,808 people removed) and “Other” (27,701 people removed).  In most states “Criminal traffic offenses include charges like driving with a suspended driver’s license, driving with no insurance and driving under the influence of alcohol (a first and 2nd offense only as 3rd time DUI’s are usually felonies.)  All of these charges are usually misdemeanors and often result in sentences of fines and probation.

The “Others” category is not defined in the DHS report but most likely includes traffic related offenses (speeding, expired driver’s license, expired tags or the favorite of small town police everywhere, having a tail light, break light or license plate light out) that are infractions rather than misdemeanors.  Other serious crimes are listed individually within this report so it is unlikely that more serious crimes are included in this “Others” category.  So of the purported 168,532 “Convicted Criminals” removed from the country, 58,509 (34.7%) of them had been convicted of traffic related offenses only.  In other words, 277,219 of 387,242 people removed (71.5%) had either convictions of a traffic related misdemeanor, a traffic related infraction (like speeding) or no record at all.

These numbers angered many advocates because it seemed to prove what opponents of draconian measures like Secured Communities and 287 agreements have been saying all along; Secured Communities is not being used primarily for the “identification and removal of public safety and national security threats as a top priority” or to  “identify individuals arrested and booked into jail for a violation of a state or local criminal offense, convicted criminals, gang members and other enforcement priorities in our jails and prisons.”  Rather it is being used more as an indiscriminant dragnet to remove low priority offenders, traffic violators and other non-criminals (victims who report crimes), making the majority of our resources spent on the lowest priority removals, making community policing more difficult by undermining the trust and confidence in police and expending precious funds, time and resources on a immigration enforcement rather than protecting and serving the local communities and creating an automatic class of victims who often will not report crimes for fear of landing themselves or their family in immigration proceedings.

I think this announcement about prosecutorial discretion was suppose to be seen as an example of how Obama is actually doing something about the immigration situation because he truly cares about this issue and is actively pushing for common sense change (like he campaigned) but has been frustrated by the myopic megalomaniacs in Congress that prefer to shirk their responsibility on immigration by supporting misguided and dangerous state laws and campaigning to spend a gazillion dollars on a pipe dream, a 100% secure border.  Instead the announce seemed more like what it really was: a thinly veiled attempt at damage control to placate the Latin voters after the removal numbers for 2010 did not reflect the sentiments expressed in the speech in El Paso, Texas about Agency priorities in our current all-eggs-in-one-basket immigration policy; enforcement, enforcement enforcement.

So all the excitement and hope as well as the angry fist shaking and chest beating was for not.  No new law, no new rights nothing really changed.  We are still in the same mess we were in August 17, 2011.  The fiscal year 2011 numbers for removal, released on October 18, 2011, are proof of this.  The report claims that ICE removed 396,906 individuals in FY2011 and that almost 55% or 216,698 of the people removed were convicted of felonies or misdemeanors.  However the report only lists the numbers removed for homicide (1,119); a sexual offense (5,848); a “drug-related crime” (44,653) and driving under the influence (35,927).  That is a total of 87,547 or the total claimed 216,698 people allegedly convicted of felonies or misdemeanors.  So of what “crimes” were the other 129,151 people convicted?  We don’t know because the report does not say.  Further even the categories that are listed, seemingly horrible crimes that should be obvious exclusions don’t tell a complete picture.  For example “drug related crimes” could be anything from possession of a marijuana pipe (something that would likely only get you a fine) to large-scale distribution and production of Meth.  Even “sexual offenses” could be anything from urinating in public to forcible rape or child molestation.  While some might argue that any crime at all no matter how small should be a valid reason to give someone the boot, the reality is that peeing in public is not the same as raping a child and should not be treated the same in any context. It does not make financial sense to spend the same amount of money tracking down and removing a public urinater as a drug lord.  The damage that deportation does to a family, a community, a city, a local economy is far-reaching and complex.  It has deep social implications that are going to be felt for decades to come.  The fact report does not differentiate between speeding and selling crack and that the categories it does list are so vague tells me that the vast majority of these “criminals” are convicted of innocuous, petty offenses that, in reality, are not “enforcement priorities.”  After all if ICE had actually managed to remove 200,000 plus people who were convicted rapist, murderers, gang members and other truly dangerous felons DHS would be hand delivering this news to the general public with very specific data, colored pie charts and maybe a tickertape parade.  Every anti-immigration yahoo out there would be waving these numbers around saying, “See I told you they are all criminals.”

The American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) and the American Immigration Council (AIC) recently released a study called “Holding DHS Accountable on Prosecutorial Discretion.”  This study concludes that the overwhelming number of ICE agents, trial attorneys and supervisors working in field offices all over the country have not changed anything in either practice or policy and several even said that they had no intention of complying with the policy directive.  In cases where an office had exercised discretion it was done haphazardly with no real direction or seeming criteria for application, some offices read the memo very narrowly and only used discretion where there was a life threatening issue or the person was eligible for other relief.  Some counted any criminal history, even petty misdemeanor or traffic offenses, as reasons to not exercise discretion some did not.  There is no consistency, there are no guidelines to follow and there is in many cases out and out defiance on even following the policy and because there are no consequences for not implementing these “enforcement priorities,” there is no oversight.   DHS seems to still be trying, at least to reign in their belligerent employees.  On November 7, 2011 they issued another memo offering a little more guidance on when to refer a case to ICE for them to issue a Notice to Appears (documents referring a person to removal proceedings) by US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS, the branch responsible for adjudicating applications).  This may address some of the issues as to when a case is referred after the person has affirmatively filed an application for some benefit, but it will likely not impact the way the vast majority of people find themselves in removal proceedings, direct contact from ICE and an review by the trial attorneys.

As of now too many Politicians have made a career on lobbing political Molotov cocktails of lies and misinformation that explode all over those who hear the words infecting them with anger and ignorance.  At the same time these same Politicians are doing everything they can to actually keep our system broken so as not to lose one of the easiest ways to get votes:  immigrant bashing.  Who cares that what they say about our system, the laws we have in place, and the effect immigrants have on our economy is not even in the same zip code as the truth?  This kind of speech is what people want to hear and what’s more gets people to the polls.  Truth is for punks and facts are for losers.  It is about giving people the facts they want to be true not the actual truth.  As long as we as a nation remain willfully ignorant of the realities of the immigration problem and continue to blame everything on immigrants rather than taking responsibility for this mess nothing will change.  As long as we continue to elect officials who use the kind of speech that promotes violence and hatred we are going to get violence and hatred in our laws and policies.

You don’t have to agree with my vision of immigration reform but this wallowing around in a miasma of self-pity, blame and uncompromising extremist ideas is as unhelpful as it is un-American.  We are a country that is suppose to innovate and finds solutions, create rather than destroy.  We are suppose to be the living example of the ideal that hard-work and stick-to-it-ness will build your dreams and the idea that if you should fall on your way to those dreams, you pick yourself back up, re-tool and try again.  We are suppose to be a bastion of freedom and humanity that leads the world in the human and civil rights and a place that anyone can build a future.  We are a nation built on immigrants taking big risks to leave their homelands and travel to a foreign land in search of a better life.  It’s not a surprise that everyone wants to come here we have spent decades promoting ourselves as the best nation on the planet and the best place to live.  The way we are treating our immigrants legal or otherwise is shameful.  The way our politicians are behaving is even worse.  It spits in the face of our legacy of humanity and equality and until we stop tolerating the flagrant use of violence and hate as an acceptable means to discuss our social ills I fear we will only see more discord and polarization.  We are better than this.  I know we are.  I have to believe we are.

ICE 2010 Deportation Data

AILA’s Study, Immigration Enforcement Off Target: Minor Offenses with Major Consequences 

 

0 Like
Tags: Criminal, Enforcement, ICE, Immigration, Immigration Myths, Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State), Morton Memo, Prosecutorial Discretion, Terror babies, Yearly Removal Numbers .

Pages

  • Welcome
  • Practice Areas
  • Professional Associations, Community Involvement and Education
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Published Work
  • Radio
  • Legislative Testimony
  • Contact Me

Address of Office

The Law Offices of
Angela L. Williams, LLC
4049 Pennsylvania Suite 201
Kansas City, MO 64111
(816)531-2166 (T)
(816)531-2444 (F)
angie.williams@me.com
www.williamslawkc.com

Find me on:

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Call me on Skype

Call me! - Angela Williams
» Get Skype, call free!

Recent Posts

  • Kansas Citys Best of the Bar for 2014 – Kansas City Business Journal
  • As Another Young Boy Commits Suicide in an Adult Prison, We Must Rethink the Prosecution of Children as Adults | Marsha Levick
  • U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan officiates her first same-sex wedding – LGBTQ Nation
  • Feds to Open Massive Family Detention Center in November
  • AILA Leadership Blog » Artesia Betrays America: Part II

Archives

  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • April 2010

Blog Topics

News

  • Huffington Post
  • Reason.com

Political Organizations

  • ACLU
  • ACLU Blog of Rights
  • Human Rights Campaign

Pro Immigrant Organizations

  • ACLU Immigrant Rights Project
  • Immigration Policy Center

USCIS News Feeds

  • Federal Register Announcements
  • TPS News Updates
  • USCIS Form Update Feed
  • USCIS News
  • USCIS Website

Tags

14th Amendment Alabama Amnesty Arizona Artesia Asylum Children CIR Comprehensive Immigration Reform DACA deferred action Deportation DOMA DREAM Act E-Verify GOP humanitarian crisis ICE Immigraiton Immigration Immigration Myths Immigration Reform Kansas City Kris Kobach Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State) LGBT Lies Marriage Equality Minors Missouri Missouri Senate Obama Prosecutorial Discretion Reform Removal SB590 Senate state based immigration State immigration laws Stupid Things Politicians Say Terror babies unaccompanied minors Waiver wasting money Will Kraus

DISCLAIMER: Nothing provided in this website should be considered to be legal advice or a legal opinion. This web site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The receipt of material from the web site or from Email transmission does not constitute an attorney-client relationship and under no circumstances should you construe any interaction with this website as creating an attorney-client relationship. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. The members of the firm are responsible for the content of this website.

All Photos and Writings are the Sole Property of Angela Williams, All Rights Reserved.

Pages

  • Welcome
  • Practice Areas
  • Professional Associations, Community Involvement and Education
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Published Work
  • Radio
  • Legislative Testimony
  • Contact Me

Archives

  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • April 2010

Categories

  • Access to justice (19)
  • American Bar Association (8)
  • Anchor Baby is a Hate Word (6)
  • Artesia (7)
  • Asylum (11)
  • Attorney-Client Relationships (4)
  • attrition through enforcement (9)
  • Barney Fisher (R-MO House) (2)
  • Birth Right Citizenship (6)
  • Border Issues (10)
  • Central America (6)
  • Change in Regs (8)
  • Comprehensive Immigration Reform (50)
  • Constitution (9)
  • Consular Processing (9)
  • Criminal Law (3)
  • DACA (11)
  • Deferred Action (1)
  • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (11)
  • Deportation (32)
    • US Citizens Mistakenly Deported (2)
    • Yearly Removal Numbers (2)
  • Document Discrimination (2)
  • DREAM Act (14)
  • E-Verify (5)
  • Economy (6)
  • Employer Penalty (1)
  • Employment Immigration Law (1)
  • Employment Visas (1)
  • Executive Orders (1)
  • Federal Criminal Law (2)
  • Federal Power (4)
  • Gang Violence (4)
  • Gangs (4)
  • Humanitarian Crisis (8)
  • I-9 (1)
  • ICE (3)
  • Immigration (91)
  • Immigration Discrimination (8)
  • Immigration Myths (25)
  • Indigent Defense (7)
  • Inspirational Thoughts (3)
  • Jason Smith (R-MO House) (4)
  • Job Creation (7)
  • Kansas State Legislature (4)
  • KIND (6)
  • LGBT Issues (16)
  • List of Shame (35)
    • Bart Karman (R-MO House) (3)
    • Chuck Gastenberger (R-MO House) (3)
    • Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State) (20)
    • Mike Kelley (R-MO House) (2)
    • Re. Virgil Peck (KS State Rep-R) (1)
    • Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R) (5)
    • Sen. Brian Nieve (MO State Senate-R) (8)
    • Sen. Will Kraus (MO State-R) (10)
    • Wanda Brown (R-Mo House) (3)
  • Marriage Equality (4)
  • Missouri (4)
  • Missouri Court of Appeals (2)
  • Missouri CriminalLaw (2)
  • Missouri House of Representatives (4)
  • Missouri Senate (15)
  • Mitt Romney (2)
  • Notario Fraud (4)
  • Office News (58)
  • Other Appalling State Legislation (15)
  • Padilla (1)
  • Perspective (8)
  • Politicians making things worse (32)
  • Practice Pointers (5)
  • Presentation Materials (1)
  • Procedure (10)
  • Prosecutorial Discretion (6)
  • Public Defenders (1)
  • Secured Communities (5)
  • Self-Deportation (10)
  • SIJS (7)
  • Speaking Engagements (1)
  • State Based Immigration Laws (28)
  • State's Rights (17)
  • Supremacy Clause (15)
  • TPS (2)
    • El Salvador (2)
  • Unaccompanied Minors (5)
  • Uncategorized (1)
  • Unskilled Labor Visas (1)
  • Victims (1)
  • Voter Fraud (3)
  • Waivers (6)
  • Wasting Money (16)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© The Law Offices of Angela L. Williams, LLC