The Law Offices of Angela L. Williams, LLC

  • Welcome
  • Practice Areas
  • Professional Associations, Community Involvement and Education
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Published Work
  • Radio
  • Legislative Testimony
  • Contact Me

Category Archives: Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R)

Bill to require English-only driver’s tests is back | The Columbia Daily Tribune – Columbia, Missouri

Posted on January 26, 2012 by Angie Williams Posted in Barney Fisher (R-MO House), Bart Karman (R-MO House), Chuck Gastenberger (R-MO House), Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Immigration, Jason Smith (R-MO House), List of Shame, Mike Kelley (R-MO House), Missouri House of Representatives, Missouri Senate, Other Appalling State Legislation, Politicians making things worse, Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R), Sen. Brian Nieve (MO State Senate-R), Sen. Will Kraus (MO State-R), State Based Immigration Laws, State's Rights, Supremacy Clause, Wanda Brown (R-Mo House), Wasting Money .

Bill to require English-only driver’s tests is back | The Columbia Daily Tribune – Columbia, Missouri.

 

More bad ideas based on bad assumptions from Jefferson City.  This bill will not have any effect on undocumented people because those people cannot get driver’s license because they do not have the proper authorization from Immigration.  This will only effect legal immigrants who are actually doing what these anti-immigrant people want, they are doing it legally.  The fact is that you do not need to even know how to read to be able to be a safe driver because signs are internationally standardized for this very reason.

On that note, it is possible for someone who is illiterate to take the Missouri Driver’s exam and this would not change that provision, only that it be given exclusively in English.  How does it, then, make sense that they are doing this as a matter of public safety?  Being able to read and study and pass a test in French somehow makes you less safe than someone who cannot read at all?  A foreign language speaker is a worse driver than someone who is illiterate?

Representatives from the Insurance industry testified against this idiotic bill as did many members of the community and heads of charitable organizations.  No one testified in favor of it.  The Insurance lobbyist said this would guarantee more uninsured drivers not more English Speaking Drivers.  He is right because people will not stop driving.  Why on earth are they wasting their time on these kind of stupid laws?  Why is this even an issue?  Because it is one more example of politicians using immigrants to confuse the issue of immigration reform.  This time they are picking on the ones who have “done it legally, which is what they claim to want.

What is almost as disturbing to me as the blatant illogical and baseless rhetoric behind this law as well as SB590 requiring schools and cops to check immigration status is that the representatives are literally spitting in the face of a representative democracy.  No one testified in favor and many against?  Yes lets pass it.  They do not care about their constituents nor the people of Missouri.  They do not care if they cost you money or endanger your businesses or children or safety on the road.  This is the 2nd vote this week that completely ignored the fact that the overwhelming majority of the comments were against the law.

0 Like
Tags: Driver's License, Foreign Language, Illiterate, Missouri House of Representatives, Road Safety, Voting with disregard for constituents .

ACTION ALERT: English Only DL Tests proposed in MO, Hearing to be held Jan 25, 2012 at 5pm in Jeff City, House Hearing RM 7

Posted on January 24, 2012 by Angie Williams Posted in Barney Fisher (R-MO House), Bart Karman (R-MO House), Chuck Gastenberger (R-MO House), Immigration, Jason Smith (R-MO House), List of Shame, Mike Kelley (R-MO House), Missouri House of Representatives, Other Appalling State Legislation, Politicians making things worse, Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R), State Based Immigration Laws, State's Rights, Supremacy Clause, Wanda Brown (R-Mo House), Wasting Money .

 

Again the Missouri House is trying to push the English only driver’s license exam, user the guise that it will protect Missouri from “illegals” obtaining Driver’s License.  The fact is  is that “illegals” cannot get Driver’s Licenses (since 2005) without actually committing the crimes of identify theft and document fraud because you have to have proof of your legal status in the United States.  This bill will not hurt undocumented people who already cannot get licenses but would hurt 100% legal immigrants and refugees.  It would also put all Missouri Driver’s at risk because it will mean that there will be more unlicensed driver’s on the street.  While driver’s licenses are a privilege not a right, the fact is that in this day and age and and especially in Missouri where there is barely public transportation in Major Cities and none in smaller towns and in more rural areas, people need to drive and will drive even if it means driving without a license because their English is not good enough to pass a written multiple choice exam.  Passing that exam in English does not make you a better or safer driver than passing it in any other language.  Our Street signs are made so that they require a minimal amount of actual reading.  Furthermore, the state provides a way for someone who is illiterate to take the exam by having someone read the questions to them.  So how is someone who cannot read at all but can pass the exam through having it given orally more safe to drive than someone who studies and learns the rules of the road in their own language and passes that exam in their own language?  This is a red herring.  It will not keep undocumented folks from getting DL’s and will punish legal immigrants making more unlicensed drivers and probably more uninsured driver’s a a result.

There is a hearing about this bill on January 25, tomorrow, at 5:00 pm in Jefferson City on the 2 proposed bills (really the same bill, I don’t know why there are 2 different bills)HB 1147 and HB1186.  The hearing is at 5:00 pm, in House Hearing Room 7 in the International Trade and Job Creation Committee.  Chaired by none other than the king of bad immigration laws in Missouri, Jerry Nolte.

I am listing the home pages of all committee members so you can email or call their office if you cannot attend in person.  Please take 5 minutes and do this because it is for sure the anti-immigration people are calling and e-mailing to express support.  You only need to say you do not support the bills and hope the reps will not either.  Easy Peasy.

“My name is ___________.  I am calling to urge Representative ______ to vote against HB 1147 and 1186 that would allow Missouri Driver’s License Exams only to be given in English.  This would not impact illegal immigrants in Missouri and only harm those who are legal.  It will create more unlicensed and uninsured drivers and harm businesses especial in smaller towns and rural areas where there is no public transportation. ”  That’s it.  Of course you can add if you want but it can be as simple as that.

Jerry Nolte, Chair Republican District 33

John McCaherty, Republican District 090, Vice Chair

TJ Berry, Republican, District 035

Rick Brattin, Republican, District 124

Jeff Grisamore, Republican District 047

Mike Kelley, Republican, District 126

Karla May, Democrat, District 057

Tracy McCreery, Independent, District 083

Kevin McManus, Democrat District 046

Judy Morgan, Democrat District 039

Mark Parkinson, Republican District 016

Scott Sifton, Democrat 096

Sheila Solon, Republican District 055

Zachary Wyatt, Republican District 002

Sponsors not on Committee:

Chuck Gatschenberger, Republican District 013

Wanda Brown, Republican, District 116

Barney Fisher, Republican District 125

Jason Smith, Republican, District 150

Bart Korman, Republican, District 099

Mike Kelley, Republican, District 126

Here is my article about the bad bills last year including an identical one to these proposing English Only DL tests.  The bill was defeated and they are trying again.  Originally published in Missouri Lawyers Weekly on February 21, 2011.

Keep reading for the test of the bills or click on the links above.

Do Missouri Law Makers Hate LEGAL Immigrants?

by Angela L. Williams

I continue to be outraged today. There are several bills that are pending in the Missouri house and senate that are taking aim at legal immigrants and proposing to turn Missouri into a state that does not welcome legal immigrants: House Bills 167, 168 & 206.  House bill 167 would require that driver’s license tests be only given in English with no interpreter allowed. House Bill 168 (also see Senate bill 195) would require that all non-citizen drivers shall have a special emblem on their driver’s license designating them as non citizens, and House Bill 206 proposes that business entities or employers that hire illegal immigrants subject to a $50,000 fine.

 This is why you should be outraged too. As this debate about what to do about immigration rages on and becomes more and more heated and violent, one thing that I have heard from opponent of immigration reform say, up until now at least, is that they have no problem with LEGAL immigrants. These bills fly in the face of even that notion. These bills clearly states to the entire world, “If you weren’t born here, we don’t want you in Missouri.”  None of these bills addresses a real concern of security, undocumented immigrants or even road safety.  I am appalled and embarrassed to be a Missourian with these kind of obviously hate driven legislation pending. 

 HB 167, the English only Driver’s exam test, purports to protect the safety of Missouri roads so the applicant of a Missouri Driver’s License  “can demonstrate his or her ability to sufficiently understand highway traffic signs and safety warnings.”  However this is so much thinly veiled nonsense.  I fail to see how studying for taking and passing the test in English shows a greater understanding of the rules of the road than studying for, taking and passing the test in any other language.  And a quick perusal through the study guide shows that specially shaped and colored signs using pictures and rarely a word or two designate signs and safety warnings.  No one needs to be able to read full sentences in order to know how to recognize a Stop sign or a Yield Sign or a Dangerous Curve Ahead sign.   Driving Signs are standardized exactly for this reason, so anyone, even someone who cannot read can understand warnings. 

 This is actually going to create more unlicensed drivers not more driver’s that speak English. Similarly, the Federal Government does not require that people speak English to become a Lawful Permanent Resident or to hold any of the other types of visas that are available.  In order to become a US Citizen people need only pass a basic exam in English that does not rise near to the level necessary to study for and pass the Driver’s License exam. See 8 USC § 1423(a)(1) And even then if you are over a certain age and have held your green card for more than 15-20 years or have a physical or mental disability you do not have to pass the English test. See 8 USC §1423(b)(1) & (2) To me this is a thinly veiled attempt to make life for immigrants more difficult. This law is meant to exclude immigrants from driving, thus making it more difficult to obtain and maintain employment and support their families and to continue to live in Missouri. And know here I am talking about 100% legal immigrants. Since July 1, 2005 undocumented folks are already excluded from obtaining a driver’s license no matter what language they speak so this is directly aimed at those immigrants who “waited in line,” “went through the process” and “did it legally,” all phrases that the anti-reform lobby likes to throw around.

Similarly HB 168 would “Require any driver’s license, commercial driver’s license, non-driver’s license, or instruction permit issued to a noncitizen who is lawfully present in the U. S. to include a noncitizen status emblem” What does that sound like to you? In September of 1941 German Law began requiring that any Jewish person over the age of 6 must wear a badge identifying themselves as such when outside the house. The point was to mark that group of people as different and thus worthy of scorn. Is this what we have come to? I am so sad and disgusted by the mere introduction of this law that I am almost speechless. Rep Steve King’s recent introduction of a federal bill that would strip the citizenship of millions of children born of undocumented parents is frighteningly close to the Nuremburg laws stripping German born Jews of German Citizenship simply for being born into a Jewish household. This frightening nativist and extremist move to intolerance and violent rhetoric is going to lead to nothing but a human right disaster. Whereas HB 167 attempts to offer a reason of safety to justify its existence, HB 168 offers no such evidence.  I can think of no reason anyone would need to know whether someone is a citizen or not.  Having this special symbol automatically sets the immigrant apart.  I can think of only discriminatory consequences that could come of marking noncitizens.  Anytime they have to present their driver’s license there non-citizen status will be displayed and put them at the mercy whoever is looking at their license. I see no reason for either of these laws except to exclude and marginalize legal immigrants and put them in an “other” status in society. It is saying to legal immigrants that you are not welcome in Missouri and you are less than.

 Finally HB 206 would impose a fine on employers for hiring someone not authorized to work in the United States is also problematic and I fear will cause employers to be leery of hiring legal immigrants for fear of this penalty. There is no definition, no indication on who will determine the legal status of the workers, what agency or entity will administer this program. The term “unauthorized alien” is not even a term that is used in the immigration laws.  The fact that the author cannot even get the terminology correct shows that states have no business trying to write laws dealing with immigration.  Immigration is a complex highly specialized area of law that most practitioners do exclusively.  It is not an area you can dabble in and be successful.  Similarly, when State legislators, who have no knowledge, experience or understanding of the complexity of Federal immigration law try their hand at writing laws pertaining to this complicated field we get dangerously ambiguous statutes that threaten the jobs of people legally authorized to work.  Currently Immigration and Customs Enforcement handles workplace audits and accountability and the lengthy process that ICE goes through in determining a worker’s legal status is onerous and complex. Missouri state officials do not have the training or expertise or the authority to make a determination on someone legal status. I fear that even people authorized to work will be victimized in Missouri if this law passes because employers will fear this penalty and decide simply not to hire foreign workers.

I am so saddened by these bills and the undercurrent of hatred, intolerance and exclusion that seems to be sweeping our society. I fear if we do not take a stand against this type of blatant bigotry, violent rhetoric and unapologetic exclusionism one day we will wake to find an America we do not recognize.  Sadly this problem is not going away and it appears to me that no politician, state of federal is really interested in seeing this system fixed.  And why would they be, conservative politicians would lose politically charged buzz phrases guaranteed to ignite peoples anger and stop people’s independent thought and liberal politicians would actually have to take a stand on something and risk an election.  In my lifetime, I have not seen another issue enrage people and cause them to lose the ability to think so completely than the issue of immigration.  The solution is common sense reform that fixes what is broken rather than laws that serve no purpose except to discriminate and alienate already legal immigrants.

Test of HB1147 English only Tests

Section A. Section 302.173, RSMo, is repealed and one new section enacted in lieu thereof, to be known as section 302.173, to read as follows:

            302.173. 1. Any applicant for a license, who does not possess a valid license issued pursuant to the laws of this state, another state, or a country which has a reciprocal agreement with the state of Missouri regarding the exchange of licenses pursuant to section 302.172 shall be examined as herein provided. Any person who has failed to renew such person’s license on or before the date of its expiration or within six months thereafter must take the complete examination. Any active member of the armed forces, their adult dependents or any active member of the peace corps may apply for a renewal license without examination of any kind, unless otherwise required by sections 302.700 to 302.780, provided the renewal application shows that the previous license had not been suspended or revoked. Any person honorably discharged from the armed forces of the United States who held a valid license prior to being inducted may apply for a renewal license within sixty days after such person’s honorable discharge without submitting to any examination of such person’s ability to safely operate a motor vehicle over the highways of this state unless otherwise required by sections 302.700 to 302.780, other than the vision test provided in section 302.175, unless the facts set out in the renewal application or record of convictions on the expiring license, or the records of the director show that there is good cause to authorize the director to require the applicant to submit to the complete examination. No applicant for a renewal license shall be required to submit to any examination of his or her ability to safely operate a motor vehicle over the highways of this state unless otherwise required by sections 302.700 to 302.780 or regulations promulgated thereunder, other than a test of the applicant’s ability to understand highway signs regulating, warning or directing traffic and the vision test provided in section 302.175, unless the facts set out in the renewal application or record of convictions on the expiring license, or the records of the director show that there is good cause to authorize the director to require the applicant to submit to the complete examination. The examination shall be made available in each county. Reasonable notice of the time and place of the examination shall be given the applicant by the person or officer designated to conduct it. The complete examination shall include a test of the applicant’s natural or corrected vision as prescribed in section 302.175, the applicant’s ability to understand highway signs regulating, warning or directing traffic, the applicant’s practical knowledge of the traffic laws of this state, and an actual demonstration of ability to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle of the classification for which the license is sought. Examinations conducted under the authority of this section shall only be administered in the English language so that the applicant can demonstrate his or her ability to read the English language sufficiently to understand highway traffic signs and safety warnings. The director shall neither supply nor permit the use of foreign language interpreters in connection with the written or driving tests required under this section. When an applicant for a license has a license from a state which has requirements for issuance of a license comparable to the Missouri requirements or a license from a country which has a reciprocal agreement with the state of Missouri regarding the exchange of licenses pursuant to section 302.172 and such license has not expired more than six months prior to the date of application for the Missouri license, the director may waive the test of the applicant’s practical knowledge of the traffic laws of this state, and the requirement of actual demonstration of ability to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle. If the director has reasonable grounds to believe that an applicant is suffering from some known physical or mental ailment which ordinarily would interfere with the applicant’s fitness to operate a motor vehicle safely upon the highways, the director may require that the examination include a physical or mental examination by a licensed physician of the applicant’s choice, at the applicant’s expense, to determine the fact. The director shall prescribe regulations to ensure uniformity in the examinations and in the grading thereof and shall prescribe and furnish all forms to the members of the highway patrol and to other persons authorized to conduct examinations as may be necessary to enable the officer or person to properly conduct the examination. The records of the examination shall be forwarded to the director who shall not issue any license hereunder if in the director’s opinion the applicant is not qualified to operate a motor vehicle safely upon the highways of this state.

            2. Beginning July 1, 2005, when the examiner has reasonable grounds to believe that an individual has committed fraud or deception during the examination process, the license examiner shall immediately forward to the director all information relevant to any fraud or deception, including, but not limited to, a statement of the examiner’s grounds for belief that the person committed or attempted to commit fraud or deception in the written, skills, or vision examination.

            3. The director of revenue shall delegate the power to conduct the examinations required for a license or permit to any member of the highway patrol or any person employed by the highway patrol. The powers delegated to any examiner may be revoked at any time by the director of revenue upon notice.

            4. Notwithstanding the requirements of subsections 1 and 3 of this section, the successful completion of a motorcycle rider training course approved pursuant to sections 302.133 to 302.137 shall constitute an actual demonstration of the person’s ability to exercise due care in the operation of a motorcycle or motortricycle, and no further driving test shall be required to obtain a motorcycle or motortricycle license or endorsement.

 

0 Like
Tags: English Only Driver's License, HB1147, HB1186, Jerry Nolte, Missouri House .

Missouri Senates Dishonors Dr. King’s memory by discussing SB590 at all much less the day after remembering his message of tolerance and equality.

Posted on January 16, 2012 by Angie Williams Posted in Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Immigration, Immigration Discrimination, Immigration Myths, List of Shame, Missouri Senate, Politicians making things worse, Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R), Sen. Brian Nieve (MO State Senate-R), Sen. Will Kraus (MO State-R), State Based Immigration Laws, Wasting Money .

What a disgraceful way to honor the memory of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr than to even be discussing such a hate-filled marginalizing bill directed toward children the day after spending the day remembering what Dr. King stood for, non-violence, inclusion, diversity, tolerance and equality.  Using children as a pawn in what has become a political war against “illegal immigration” is despicable and disheartening.  What legislation like this does is devalues people, disrupts families and creates a rift between “us” and “them” that is getting harder and harder to bridge.  It is also exactly what Federal Politicians want.  Why should they push for reform when they can sit back, risk nothing and watch while every one else has to bare the burden of their impotence and cowardice to act.  Why should they have to do any real work when they can push their responsibilities off on the states who can push their responsibilities off on local communities, local law enforcement, local businesses and now local teachers, principals, schools and even children.  People like Will Kraus, Kobach, Nolte, Nieves and the like do not care that they are ruining families, communities, forcing kids out of schools.  They can put they are “tough on illegal immigration” and feel all self righteous in their efforts to combat this problem when the federal government won’t.  The problem is that now they are picking on children.  They want schools to report on the costs and effects having undocumented children in our classrooms has on education, but who is going to report on the societal costs of alienating children, degrading their self esteem and possibly scaring them away from attending school at all.  No one, and truly the do not care.  Do not let them lie to you they do not care about Missouri Children, our communities or you as a tax payer or voter.  If they propose and support short sighted legislation like this, meant to use children as a batting ram in their zeal to push their own agendas they  will turn on you and your cause next.

 

Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity. -Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.- THomas Jefferson

I will be honoring Dr. King tomorrow as I travel to Jefferson City to speak out against this hateful bill.  If you would like to join me please mail me for more information.  It is at 3 pm.  If you cannot consider emailing the reps not he General Laws committees and your own state rep to voice your dissent.

0 Like
Tags: Alabama, discrimination, Immigration, Missouri Senate, SB590, Schools, Status of Students, Teachers .

HEARING SCHEDULED FOR SB590 Jan 17, 2012 at 3 pm. Contact me if you want to attend or send written testimony.

Posted on January 12, 2012 by Angie Williams Posted in Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State), List of Shame, Missouri Senate, Office News, Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R), Sen. Brian Nieve (MO State Senate-R), Sen. Will Kraus (MO State-R), State Based Immigration Laws, Wasting Money .

Ok the heinous bill proposed by Will Kraus that would require schools to check immigration status among other things is coming up for hearing very soon. The hearing has been scheduled for SB 590, the Alabama copy-cat bill that would force schools to report the immigration status of their students and parents, require police to check for papers at all stops, and require the arrest of individuals “suspected” of being undocumented. This legislation has been a disaster in states where it has already passed, and we cannot allow it to become law in Missouri.

The hearing is scheduled for 3pm on Tuesday, January 17 in the Senate General Laws Committee. It is very important that we have as many people as possible testify against this bill. If you or someone from your organization can be in Jefferson City to testify, please let me know ASAP. We will help prepare you before hand, and if necessary, we may be able to line up some car pools. If you cannot make it, please consider sending written testimony that we may turn in on your behalf. You can email me directly your comments if you cannot appear personally. Please include your name and address and if you are speaking on behalf of an organization please include the name and address of the organization and your position, if any. i am planning on appearing to testify against this live. Also let me know if you are interested in appearing live, even if you do not want to testify, a full hearing room with people who are against the bill is important too.

0 Like
Tags: Alabama, Immigration status of children, Missouri, public schools, SB590, Senate, Will Kraus .

Missouri Sen. Will Kraus submits a disgraceful, child hating, family and community destroying Alabama type bill.

Posted on January 4, 2012 by Angie Williams Posted in Comprehensive Immigration Reform, Immigration, Immigration Myths, Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State), List of Shame, Missouri Senate, Politicians making things worse, Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R), Sen. Brian Nieve (MO State Senate-R), Sen. Will Kraus (MO State-R), State Based Immigration Laws, Wasting Money .

The Newest Appalling Senate Bill from Missouri

This is the newest version of idiocy out of the Missouri Senate. “all public elementary and secondary schools shall determine if students are born outside the United States or are the children of an unlawfully present alien at the time of enrollment by checking the original birth certificate or certified copy thereof. If it is determined that te child is born outside of the u tied states or is the child of an unlawfully present alien the United States the parents shall notify the school of the actual citizenship or immigration status of the child with documentation.

This gem was introduced by Senator Will Kraus From Eastern Jackson County. I am outraged to see that he has apparently won the “A Better Missouri for Children Award” from the Missouri PTA.  Apparently he only wants a better Missouri for English speaking children with 100% legal family members, those from mixed immigration status families or who don’t speak English are out of luck.  The Missouri PTA (Here is a link to their email, send them a note telling them so)  should revoke this award from someone who clearly cares noting about Missouri’s children.

This legislation is financially irresponsible seeing as though all similar legislation has been blocked by a variety of circuit judges across the country, and the Arizona bill, which doesn’t even go as far as targeting children, is suppose to be heard by the Supremes this term.  It is also going to devastate the Missouri economy just like it has in Alabama and Georgia.

It is also inhumane, unchristian (if you believe in that), uncharitable and down right mean.  It is exactly these types of toxic, hateful megalomaniacs that make politics so rancid.  People like Will Kraus, Brian Nieves, Jerry Nolte, Kris Kobach, who would propose such a bill that is meant to destroy families and communities and vilify and marginalize children deserve a special place in hell.  I can hardly see how they manage to look themselves in the mirror every morning knowing they are spending their lives destroying and tearing down rather than building up and healing.  They are a disgrace to public servants, to Missouri and to whatever religion they likely self righteously claim to be.

Anyone who is a teacher or a parent or knows a child should be appalled and outraged.  Below is the text of the bill and if you are not in the bathroom vomiting by the end see below for additional comments on other aspects that are disgraceful, unconstitutional, inhumane and poorly written.

“SB 590 – All public elementary and secondary schools shall determine whether enrolling students are born outside of the United States or are children of an unlawfully present alien at the time of enrollment by checking students’ original birth certificates or certified copies thereof. If it is determined that a student was born outside of the United States or is the child of an unlawfully present alien, the parent or guardian shall notify the school of the actual citizenship or immigration status of the child with accompanying documentation.

 The State Board of Education shall compile and submit an annual report to the General Assembly containing information regarding immigration classifications of enrolled students, numbers of participants in English as a second language programs, and the effects of education quality as a result of enrollment of unlawfully present aliens and the costs associated. Public disclosure of information which personally identifies a student shall be unlawful.

 Upon any lawful stop, detention, or arrest, law enforcement shall determine the citizenship and immigration status of the person if there is reasonable suspicion that the person is an unlawfully present alien. If an alien is determined by the federal government to be unlawfully present, the law enforcement agency shall cooperate in the transfer of the alien into federal custody.

 The act creates a Class C misdemeanor crime of willful failure to complete or carry an alien registration document if the person is unlawfully present and in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1304 or 8 U.S.C. 1306 which requires certain persons to carry alien registration documents, apply for alien registration, and be fingerprinted.

CHRIS HOGERTY”

 

Ok now that you are done reading this heinous excuse for a law, here are some technical things that I see wrong with this.

The First Paragraph:  Other than to strike fear in the hearts of parents, humiliate children and break the bonds of trust that exist between the school and the families they serve, this section serves no purpose.  It does not even pro port to do anything.  Just that the schools will now have to pry into the lives of the families.  It doesn’t say what they are to do with this information just that they have to ask for it.  The only point is to terrorize.  This is designed to scare undocumented parents out of the district.  It is designed to tell the children of these folks that they are less important and not worth educating.  The school in a local school district is sometimes the only trusted place some people have to go.  Number one, only an immigration judge can determine if someone is an “unlawfully present alien.”  Period.  Not the cops, not an ICE agent, Not a teacher or a principal.  When someone is put into removal proceedings they are issued a “notice to Appear” that has allegations on it (it is alleged that  (Insert person here) is: 1. Not a native or citizen of the United States, 2. Is a Native and Citizen of Mexico 3.  Entered the country at an unknown time in an unknown place without being inspected or authorized to do so.)  The hearing is meant to prove whether the allegations are true or false. Until an immigration judge has made that finding that those allegations are true a person’s status is not determined.

The Second Paragraph: The School Board now will have to report the immigration status of their students, the number of kids participating in ESL and apparently make assessments on how educating undocumented children degrades the quality of education.   This paragraph is also confusing (aside from its awkward wording and grammar) because I cannot tell if Kraus is implying that having ESL kids degrades the education of other students, or  if simply having an undocumented child listening to a lesson downgrades the educational experience for everyone.  It is also written in a way that suggest that having these undocumented children in the class can only negatively impact the “education quality.”  It assumes that these children hurt the educational experience of other children.  What a great way to educate children, lets make them feel inferior (the undocumented children) or superior and resentful (the non undocumented children having their school experience “ruined”).  Lets set up cliques by law.  Brilliant.

The Third Paragraph:  This same language has been found problematic time and again in other state immigration laws.  The police must determine the immigrate status (see above as to how this is impossible)  of anyone who they lawfully stop, detain or arrest when they have “reasonable suspicion” to believe the person is an “unlawfully present alien.”  Despite all the righteous indignation of Kris Kobach that “reasonable suspicion”  means something other than “brown and speaks with an accent” let’s not be dense.  Reasonable suspicion means exactly that: brown, accent speech/non english speaking.  I can assure you no one will ever have reasonable suspicion that I am an “unlawfully present alien” ever.  No cop will ever ask me to prove I am here legally because I am white.  (I could be Canadian, or from one of the many countries in Western Europe and be just as “unlawfully present” but I will never be asked.)

Finally, The last paragraph:  It is entirely unclear what this paragraph even says.  It appears to make it a class C misdemeanor for someone who is unlawfully present and in violation of 8 USC 1304 or  8 USC 1306.  1304 says you have to register and be fingerprinted and keep your address current by complying with the forms that USCIS has set up to do so, i.e. applying for either an immigrant visa or a non-immigrant visa. 1306 is the penalty section for these sections.  So I really don’t think you can be in violation of a section that just proscribes penalties and I think the intent of 1304 is to make sure that people renew their visas and residents cards and always carry them.  So if you are unlawfully present and don’t have your visa and/or resident card then you are guilty of a C misdemeanor?  And if you are legal and don’t have this documentation and are suppose to (technically this is a crime in the federal law but according to tracker only 11 people were even charged with this in 2011 and only 2 convicted,) you are not guilty of this crime?

This mish-mash of bad grammar, poor sentence construction, ambiguous ideas and improperly used terminology is yet another reasons why state legislature should not  be anywhere near immigration laws.

I beg you.  Please call or email your state senator and  rep and tell them this is disgraceful and will harm Missouri just like it has harmed Alabama and Georgia.  Please express your outrage for these children, legal or no, born to documented or undocumented parents.  Children should not be a battering ram in this fight.  Shame on you Will Kraus, winner of “A Better Missouri for Children” award.  You are a disgrace.

 

0 Like
Tags: Alabama, Brian Nieve, Children, Economy, Immigration, Immigration Status of Children in School, Jerry Nolte, Kris Kobach, Reasonable Suspecision, School, State Law, State Laws, Will Kraus .

Pages

  • Welcome
  • Practice Areas
  • Professional Associations, Community Involvement and Education
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Published Work
  • Radio
  • Legislative Testimony
  • Contact Me

Address of Office

The Law Offices of
Angela L. Williams, LLC
4049 Pennsylvania Suite 201
Kansas City, MO 64111
(816)531-2166 (T)
(816)531-2444 (F)
angie.williams@me.com
www.williamslawkc.com

Find me on:

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn

Call me on Skype

Call me! - Angela Williams
» Get Skype, call free!

Recent Posts

  • Kansas Citys Best of the Bar for 2014 – Kansas City Business Journal
  • As Another Young Boy Commits Suicide in an Adult Prison, We Must Rethink the Prosecution of Children as Adults | Marsha Levick
  • U.S. Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan officiates her first same-sex wedding – LGBTQ Nation
  • Feds to Open Massive Family Detention Center in November
  • AILA Leadership Blog » Artesia Betrays America: Part II

Archives

  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • April 2010

Blog Topics

News

  • Huffington Post
  • Reason.com

Political Organizations

  • ACLU
  • ACLU Blog of Rights
  • Human Rights Campaign

Pro Immigrant Organizations

  • ACLU Immigrant Rights Project
  • Immigration Policy Center

USCIS News Feeds

  • Federal Register Announcements
  • TPS News Updates
  • USCIS Form Update Feed
  • USCIS News
  • USCIS Website

Tags

14th Amendment Alabama Amnesty Arizona Artesia Asylum Children CIR Comprehensive Immigration Reform DACA deferred action Deportation DOMA DREAM Act E-Verify GOP humanitarian crisis ICE Immigraiton Immigration Immigration Myths Immigration Reform Kansas City Kris Kobach Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State) LGBT Lies Marriage Equality Minors Missouri Missouri Senate Obama Prosecutorial Discretion Reform Removal SB590 Senate state based immigration State immigration laws Stupid Things Politicians Say Terror babies unaccompanied minors Waiver wasting money Will Kraus

DISCLAIMER: Nothing provided in this website should be considered to be legal advice or a legal opinion. This web site is not intended to create an attorney-client relationship. The receipt of material from the web site or from Email transmission does not constitute an attorney-client relationship and under no circumstances should you construe any interaction with this website as creating an attorney-client relationship. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements. The members of the firm are responsible for the content of this website.

All Photos and Writings are the Sole Property of Angela Williams, All Rights Reserved.

Pages

  • Welcome
  • Practice Areas
  • Professional Associations, Community Involvement and Education
  • Awards and Recognitions
  • Speaking Engagements
  • Published Work
  • Radio
  • Legislative Testimony
  • Contact Me

Archives

  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • March 2011
  • August 2010
  • April 2010

Categories

  • Access to justice (19)
  • American Bar Association (8)
  • Anchor Baby is a Hate Word (6)
  • Artesia (7)
  • Asylum (11)
  • Attorney-Client Relationships (4)
  • attrition through enforcement (9)
  • Barney Fisher (R-MO House) (2)
  • Birth Right Citizenship (6)
  • Border Issues (10)
  • Central America (6)
  • Change in Regs (8)
  • Comprehensive Immigration Reform (50)
  • Constitution (9)
  • Consular Processing (9)
  • Criminal Law (3)
  • DACA (11)
  • Deferred Action (1)
  • Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (11)
  • Deportation (32)
    • US Citizens Mistakenly Deported (2)
    • Yearly Removal Numbers (2)
  • Document Discrimination (2)
  • DREAM Act (14)
  • E-Verify (5)
  • Economy (6)
  • Employer Penalty (1)
  • Employment Immigration Law (1)
  • Employment Visas (1)
  • Executive Orders (1)
  • Federal Criminal Law (2)
  • Federal Power (4)
  • Gang Violence (4)
  • Gangs (4)
  • Humanitarian Crisis (8)
  • I-9 (1)
  • ICE (3)
  • Immigration (91)
  • Immigration Discrimination (8)
  • Immigration Myths (25)
  • Indigent Defense (7)
  • Inspirational Thoughts (3)
  • Jason Smith (R-MO House) (4)
  • Job Creation (7)
  • Kansas State Legislature (4)
  • KIND (6)
  • LGBT Issues (16)
  • List of Shame (35)
    • Bart Karman (R-MO House) (3)
    • Chuck Gastenberger (R-MO House) (3)
    • Kris Kobach (KS Secretary of State) (20)
    • Mike Kelley (R-MO House) (2)
    • Re. Virgil Peck (KS State Rep-R) (1)
    • Rep. Jerry Nolte (MO State Rep-R) (5)
    • Sen. Brian Nieve (MO State Senate-R) (8)
    • Sen. Will Kraus (MO State-R) (10)
    • Wanda Brown (R-Mo House) (3)
  • Marriage Equality (4)
  • Missouri (4)
  • Missouri Court of Appeals (2)
  • Missouri CriminalLaw (2)
  • Missouri House of Representatives (4)
  • Missouri Senate (15)
  • Mitt Romney (2)
  • Notario Fraud (4)
  • Office News (58)
  • Other Appalling State Legislation (15)
  • Padilla (1)
  • Perspective (8)
  • Politicians making things worse (32)
  • Practice Pointers (5)
  • Presentation Materials (1)
  • Procedure (10)
  • Prosecutorial Discretion (6)
  • Public Defenders (1)
  • Secured Communities (5)
  • Self-Deportation (10)
  • SIJS (7)
  • Speaking Engagements (1)
  • State Based Immigration Laws (28)
  • State's Rights (17)
  • Supremacy Clause (15)
  • TPS (2)
    • El Salvador (2)
  • Unaccompanied Minors (5)
  • Uncategorized (1)
  • Unskilled Labor Visas (1)
  • Victims (1)
  • Voter Fraud (3)
  • Waivers (6)
  • Wasting Money (16)

WordPress

  • Log in
  • WordPress

CyberChimps WordPress Themes

© The Law Offices of Angela L. Williams, LLC